The veteran K-pop group g.o.d (Groove Over Dose) and their management, Gemstone E&M, have taken a firm stance against the persistent issue of fan intrusions into the members’ private lives and professional spaces.
On November 23, [2025], the agency released a detailed statement announcing new, strict measures aimed at protecting the artists’ schedules and privacy.
This decision was prompted by the “continued visits to non-public schedules (company office and practice room, etc.) and uncoordinated support deliveries,” highlighting the necessity for immediate fan cooperation to maintain a safe and healthy environment.
Prohibition of Unauthorized Access to Private Spaces
The primary concern addressed by Gemstone E&M is the unauthorized physical presence of fans in areas strictly off-limits to the public.
The agency explicitly singled out the company office and the practice room as locations where unauthorized visits have been repeatedly occurring, directly interfering with the members’ work and rest.
The official warning delivered by the agency was unambiguous: “Visiting non-public schedules or private spaces that have not been announced in advance can lead to invasions of privacy and is strictly prohibited.”
This rule emphasizes the critical boundary between the artists’ public careers and their personal security and workspace.
For a group like g.o.d, whose members are busy preparing for major events, the ability to focus in a secure and private setting is paramount.
The intrusion into non-public schedules compromises the professional integrity and efficiency of their operations, necessitating this severe restriction to safeguard the members’ rights.
Mandatory Coordination for Fan Support
Beyond physical intrusion, the agency also detailed a structured policy change regarding fan gifts and event support.
Previously, issues had arisen with the handling, storage, and delivery of uncoordinated support, causing logistical problems on site.
To streamline this process and prevent further issues, Gemstone E&M has established a mandatory coordination system:
- Application Process: Fans wishing to send support must first apply by email and then establish clear communication with the designated manager.
- Rejection Policy: The agency clearly stated, “Any support delivered without prior coordination will not be accepted on site.”
This new procedure ensures that all fan support is properly accounted for, managed safely, and delivered efficiently, reinforcing the agency’s commitment to both acknowledging fan generosity and maintaining logistical order around the artists’ activities.
Context of g.o.d’s Legacy and Upcoming Schedule
This privacy warning is particularly poignant given g.o.d’s nearly three-decade history.
Debuting in 1999, the group became known as the “national group” through chart-topping hits like ‘Road’ and their popular reality show appearance on ‘Diary of Parenting.’
After a period of solo activities and a hiatus, the five original members successfully reunited for full-group promotions in 2015, maintaining a devoted and passionate fanbase.
The need for these strict measures comes right as the group prepares for a major end-of-year concert series. g.o.d is scheduled to hold full-group concerts in two major cities:
- Seoul: KSPO Dome, scheduled for December 5–7.
- Busan: BEXCO, scheduled for December 20–21.
The agency concluded its statement by appealing for “active cooperation” from the fandom, stressing that these guidelines are essential “For a healthy fan culture and to protect the artists’ privacy” and vowing to continue their best efforts to protect the artists’ rights.
The successful execution of these highly anticipated concerts hinges on the members’ ability to prepare without external disturbances.
A short video clip featuring BTS members Jimin and Jungkook in a practice room has recently gone viral on social media, sparking a significant online debate centered on Jimin’s vocals.
The clip, which showed the two idols dancing and singing casually, led to a swift and intense backlash from some netizens who criticized the quality of Jimin’s singing.
This criticism quickly fueled a counter-movement by the artist’s dedicated fanbase, resulting in a polarized conversation that dominated K-pop discussions online.
The Viral Clip and Vocal Criticism
The clip, which began circulating around November 21, 2025, captured a brief, seemingly casual moment between Jimin and Jungkook in what appeared to be a rehearsal or practice setting.
While the clip’s specific context or the song being performed was not detailed in the article, its focus quickly became Jimin’s vocal delivery.
A faction of social media users was highly critical of the vocals heard in the snippet, using the video to question Jimin’s skill and training.
BTS’s Jimin (Credit: YouTube)
- Questioning Experience: Comments focused on his extensive training period and over a decade as an idol, suggesting his vocal quality was unacceptable given his professional history.
- Direct Comparisons: Some users claimed that they could sing better than him even “without training or practicing,” attempting to belittle his talent.
- Harsh Assessments: The criticism escalated to outright dismissiveness, with one user claiming his vocals were so poor they were “battling for last place” in terms of quality, while another mockingly suggested he “forgot to take vocal lessons.”
The Fan Defense and Counter-Arguments
The backlash was immediately met with a robust defense from Jimin’s fans, who fiercely countered the negative narratives and criticisms.
Many fans argued that there was absolutely nothing wrong with his voice, suggesting that the critique was unfounded or driven by malice.
The main points raised by the defenders included:
- Disagreement Statistics: One user pointed to the high number of people who had reacted positively to the clip (over 526K), claiming that this massive number of supportive reactions—99.7% of the total—disagreed with the negative opinion.
- Subjectivity of Sound: Several defenders insisted that he “literally sounds good,” arguing that the perceived flaw was either non-existent or a subjective interpretation.
- Focus on Haters: Some defense posts pivoted to criticizing the motivations of the original posters, suggesting that the backlash was an attempt to discredit the artist rather than an honest critique of his talent.
- Irony and Support: Other fans used humor and irony to express their support, with one person stating his voice was “so good I almost liked a hate tweet.”
The dual-sided nature of the conversation reflects the powerful, polarized online fandom culture that often surrounds major K-pop artists, where any piece of media, regardless of its original context, can become a battleground for vocal defense or harsh criticism.
Ongoing Dating Rumors Context
The article noted that this vocal controversy occurred while Jimin continued to be swept up in persistent dating rumors involving actress Song Da Eun.
Despite his agency releasing an official statement regarding the dating rumors in the past, new “evidence” and speculation frequently go viral, maintaining public interest in the alleged romance.
This constant media coverage and fan scrutiny add another layer of pressure and public discussion surrounding the idol, demonstrating how different facets of an idol’s personal and professional life can converge in the online discourse.
