DC’s latest update on the anticipated Lanterns live-action series has ignited a storm among longtime Green Lantern fans and newcomers alike.
The news: Hal Jordan , classic Green Lantern and fan favorite since his comics debut, will serve more as a mentor or transitional figure rather than headline the franchise. Instead, rising star Aaron Pierre steps into the limelight as John Stewart, signaling a swift handoff that many never expected to see so soon.
Initial reactions across Reddit, DC fan sites, and entertainment news outlets have been sharply divided. Some see the move as a progressive update, pointing out that John Stewart already became the main Green Lantern in the comics after Hal stepped aside years ago.
Others argue it’s disrespectful to Hal’s decades-long history, especially after the poorly received 2011 Green Lantern movie left his legacy in need of redemption.
Screen Rant’s reporting confirms that showrunner Chris Mundy describes the Lanterns series as centered “in a lot of ways about replacement,” teasing themes of generational change and when it’s time to let the next hero take the reins.
With Chandler cast as the older Hal and Pierre as the youthful John, fans speculate Hal will be phased out quickly, fueling debates over whether the franchise should reboot or build on the originals.
The Fan Backlash: Nostalgia Meets New Narratives
Online reactions highlight a significant divide within the Green Lantern fan base. On Reddit and in comment sections, many argue that Hal Jordan’s story still has miles to go; they want to see his arc explored, especially since the first live-action attempt was met with criticism.
For these fans, jumping straight to Stewart as a lead could mean cutting iconic Green Lantern stories before they’ve had a chance to connect with modern viewers.
Yet others, like fans posting under DC groups and comics forums, welcome the twist, noting Stewart’s popularity in animated shows and comics, and how his military background brings needed representation and a fresh perspective to the screen.
Lanterns (Credit: IMDb)
John Stewart’s comic journey from backup Lantern to leader saw him face systemic bias, personal loss, and difficult missions, making him a layered, relatable character for many. Something DC’s recent hits, including Peacemaker, have capitalized on with more complex leads.
There’s also talk about the business behind the shift. Some fans on entertainment blogs argue the show’s writers, including acclaimed figures from Black Mirror and Watchmen, are eager to bring in new audiences and avoid retreading old movie failures.
By making Lanterns more like a detective thriller set on Earth, DC hopes to reboot the entire Green Lantern mythos for fans burnt out on overblown CGI and space opera clichés. However, others caution that focusing too closely on replacements might alienate viewers who want a balance of legacy and innovation.
What DC’s Gamble Means for the Franchise
This polarization is more than just fan infighting; it reveals how superhero franchises must evolve to survive. DC’s Lanterns update hints at ambitious plans: create fresh stories, reclaim critical ground lost to previous flops, and leverage character diversity to build new loyalty.
Casting a younger lead while letting older heroes mentor signals a long-term approach like Marvel’s with Hawkeye and Ms. Marvel.
Whether the handoff succeeds depends on execution and on whether DC proves it won’t simply toss beloved legacy characters aside. Some industry experts point out that, if Lanterns invests deeply in Stewart’s arc while letting Hal remain a meaningful force, the show could bridge old and new fans.
Creators have indicated the series will launch in early 2026 with a mix of grounded storytelling and classic comic inspiration, giving hope that Lanterns could expand the Green Lantern mythos after years of uncertain adaptations.
For now, passionate arguments continue on fan forums and social media, with everyone watching DC’s bold move and wondering whose light will shine the brightest.
Gary Oldman’s Apple TV+ series Slow Horses has quietly notched a streaming milestone few shows achieve: over 500 days in the platform’s domestic Top 10 list. This enduring popularity places it among Apple TV+’s most successful originals ever and signals a major shift in how audiences engage with spy thrillers.
The show’s fifth season has only expanded this fanbase, proving there’s a hunger for darker, more complex narratives compared to typical espionage fare.
Based on Mick Herron’s award-winning novels, Slow Horses stands apart from classic spy stories like James Bond through its focus on intelligence agents sidelined for mistakes, stuck in a bureaucratic purgatory.
Oldman’s grumpy, disheveled Jackson Lamb leads this group of outcasts with sharp wit and a survivalist’s edge rather than charm or gadgets. His portrayal subverts expectations and resonates with viewers frustrated by formulaic, glamorized spies.
Critics have widely praised the series for its writing, performances, and tone, boasting a 97% Rotten Tomatoes score and multiple Emmy nominations, including lead acting nods for Oldman. The long tail of acclaim and word-of-mouth has fueled the show’s longevity and streaming success in an era where instant hits often fade fast.
This marks a turning point for spy dramas on streaming platforms, revealing how mature, flawed characters and layered storytelling can build dedicated audiences beyond blockbuster spectacle. It also highlights Apple TV+’s growing strength as a home for prestige dramas that prioritize narrative depth.
A Contrast to Bond: Why Oldman’s Spy Sparks New Viewer Interest
Slow Horses’ rise comes amid a complicated moment for the James Bond franchise . Despite its iconic status, Bond faces pressure to evolve amidst changing audience preferences and the streaming revolution.
Where Bond dazzles with style, gadgets, and international glamour, Slow Horses embraces the messy, bureaucratic side of intelligence work. Jackson Lamb’s cynical, often abrasive demeanor offers an “anti-Bond” figure: a hero more defined by flaws and survival instincts than by polish and charm.
This grounded take on espionage strikes a chord with viewers craving authentic character struggles and realism within the genre.
This shift reflects a broader cultural appetite for narratives where heroes are gray rather than black-and-white and where moral ambiguity drives the story. Streaming platforms, by allowing binge-watching and deeper character arcs over time, are perfectly suited for such nuanced stories to unfold.
Moreover, Oldman’s performance acts as a masterclass in bringing such complexity to life. His layered presence anchors the show’s tone, balancing dark humor with vulnerability, and making Jackson Lamb both frustrating and compelling.
This complexity distinguishes Slow Horses from recent attempts at spy dramas struggling to find a fresh footing.
What Slow Horses Means for Gary Oldman and the Spy Genre’s Next Chapter
For Gary Oldman, Slow Horses has become one of the defining achievements of his illustrious career. After winning an Oscar for Darkest Hour in 2018, Oldman has embraced long-form storytelling, with this series allowing him to reach global audiences in a way films alone could not.
Gary Oldman (Credit: BBC)
The show’s renewal through additional seasons reflects both viewer demand and confidence in Oldman’s central role.
The series sets a new standard for spy dramas, emphasizing character-driven plots. Its success should encourage producers and networks to innovate beyond rebooting legendary franchises or relying on formulaic spectacle.
Instead, the path forward for espionage narratives may lie in anti-heroes, moral complexity, and deeply human portrayals of secret agents wrestling with their own failures.
The long-term impact on the spy genre is likely significant. As streaming audiences grow accustomed to shows like Slow Horses that merge genre traditions with darker, character-centric storytelling, older models symbolized by Bond’s slick, action-heavy approach will need reinvention to compete.
Shows that embrace vulnerability and less glamorous depictions of espionage could become the new norm.
Additionally, Oldman’s celebrated portrayal shows that star power combined with nuanced stories can reinvigorate actors’ careers and bring fresh viewers to the genre.
The careful balance between gritty realism and moments of sharp humor proves vital to sustained success, differentiating Slow Horses from both past and current spy offerings in film and TV.
What the Future Holds for Spy Thrillers on Streaming
With Slow Horses smashing records and reshaping expectations, the spy genre appears positioned for reinvention. Streaming’s flexibility allows deeper, ongoing exploration of complex characters like Jackson Lamb that mainstream cinema struggles to provide.
This offers opportunities for sustained character development, long narratives, and exploration of intelligence work’s darker realities, all wrapped in sharp writing and mature themes.
The appetite for such stories is only set to grow as viewers seek alternatives to franchises heavily tied to nostalgia or spectacle. Slow Horses’ ongoing critical and commercial success suggests the genre’s future will be a mix of legacy heroes like Bond and new, flawed protagonists demanding a seat at the table.
For now, Gary Oldman’s portrayal of the anti-Bond sets a benchmark for how the spy thriller can evolve in today’s media environment, proving that sometimes imperfection and realism are the most powerful traits of all.
