Low-budget filmmaking is often seen as a challenge in the cinema world. Many believe that to create a great film, you need a large budget, high-end technology, and a team of experts. However, there are exceptions to this belief. One such exception is the film Coherence, released in 2013.
This movie is a shining example of how a small budget can still yield big ideas and meaningful storytelling. It proves that filmmakers can create engaging content without the need for major studio backing or expensive special effects.
The film’s director, James Ward Byrkit, adopted a resourceful approach similar to that of Robert Rodriguez, a filmmaker known for his ability to make movies on limited budgets. Rodriguez famously made El Mariachi with only $7,000, and Byrkit followed a similar path. He had a strong cast, a house to film in, and an interesting concept. With these elements, he crafted a film that resonates with audiences on many levels.
The Story of Coherence
Coherence tells the story of a dinner party that goes horribly wrong. Eight friends gather for a seemingly normal evening, but as the night unfolds, strange and unsettling events occur. The film fits into the category of cosmic horror, a genre that emphasizes the fear of the unknown. In Coherence, the unknown is represented by the bizarre changes in reality that the characters experience.
The film begins with the characters interacting in their usual manner. Among them are Em and Mike, played by Emily Baldoni and Nicholas Brendon, respectively. Em is hesitant about her relationship with Mike, and their discussions highlight their complicated feelings. Other characters include Laurie, Lee, Amir, and Beth, each with their own backstories and relationships that add depth to the narrative.
As the story progresses, the characters face an unexpected challenge when the power goes out. This event triggers a series of strange occurrences, leading them to question their understanding of reality. The arrival of doppelgangers and the influence of Miller’s Comet add further confusion and tension.
The film skillfully combines elements of science fiction with the personal struggles of the characters, resulting in a rich narrative filled with suspense and intrigue.
Character Dynamics and Relationships
The characters in Coherence are not just random friends thrown together; they each have their own histories and relationships that shape the story. The dynamics among them are complex. Emily and Kevin are a couple, but their relationship is shaky.
Emily is hesitant to join Kevin on a work trip abroad, which creates tension between them. Adding to this complication is Laurie, Kevin’s ex-girlfriend, who tries to rekindle her relationship with him during the party. This love triangle introduces emotional depth and drama to the plot.
The film’s dialogue feels natural and improvised. The characters speak to each other as real friends would, which makes their interactions believable. As the story progresses, their discussions become increasingly frantic as they attempt to understand what is happening around them. The atmosphere becomes tense as the reality they knew begins to unravel.
This scheme of personal relationships is a key element of the film. The characters’ feelings, desires, and fears emerge in the midst of the chaos. As they confront the unknown, they are forced to deal with their own insecurities and relationships. The film expertly balances the cosmic horror elements with these personal struggles, creating a compelling narrative that keeps the audience engaged.
Improv and Minimalism in Filmmaking
One of the standout features of Coherence is its use of improvisation. Byrkit took a unique approach by casting actors known for their improv skills. He provided them with basic character motivations and a loose outline of the plot but allowed them to create their dialogue and interactions. This technique adds a sense of authenticity to the film and contributes to the feeling of spontaneity throughout the story.
Byrkit’s decision to embrace minimalism is also evident in the film’s production. With a small budget, he relied on a straightforward approach to filmmaking.
The film is shot in a single location, which adds to the claustrophobic feel. The lighting is simple, yet effective, reinforcing the sense of being trapped in a strange reality. The characters are confined to the house, creating an atmosphere of tension and uncertainty.
This minimalist style is reminiscent of the classic anthology series The Twilight Zone, which inspired Byrkit. The show often shows strange and unsettling themes, leaving audiences with more questions than answers. Similarly, Coherence raises philosophical questions about reality, identity, and the nature of existence.
The film’s narrative and visual style work together to create an experience that feels both fresh and reminiscent of classic sci-fi storytelling.
Philosophical Themes and Ideas
At its core, Coherence is not just a sci-fi thriller; it is a film that challenges the audience to think deeply about complex ideas. The themes presented in the film touch on personal identity, the nature of reality, and the implications of free will. These concepts are shown through the characters’ experiences as they face a world where the rules of reality seem to have changed.
One of the key philosophical ideas in the film is the concept of Schrödinger’s Cat, a thought experiment in quantum mechanics. This idea illustrates the uncertainty of reality, where a cat in a box can be simultaneously alive and dead until observed. In Coherence, the characters find themselves in a similar situation.
They are faced with multiple versions of themselves, leading to questions about identity and existence. The film challenges viewers to consider what makes us who we are and how our choices shape our reality.
The passing of Miller’s Comet serves as a catalyst for the characters’ existential crisis. Its influence disrupts their understanding of reality, forcing them to confront their fears and uncertainties. The comet symbolizes the unknown, a force that alters the fabric of their lives. As the characters grapple with the changes around them, they must also confront their own desires and motivations.
This scheme of big ideas is what sets Coherence apart from other sci-fi films. While it may not have the visual effects or elaborate sets of larger productions, it compensates with its thought-provoking themes and strong character development. The film challenges audiences to engage with its narrative on a deeper level, making it a memorable entry in the science fiction genre.
The Reception of Coherence
Despite its innovative approach and thought-provoking themes, Coherence has remained somewhat underappreciated. It did not receive the same level of attention as other indie films or major sci-fi releases. However, those who have seen it often praise its originality and depth. The film’s unique style and narrative structure have garnered a cult following among fans of independent cinema and science fiction.
Critics have noted that Coherence is a bold experiment in no-budget filmmaking. Its mix of sci-fi concepts with strong character dynamics creates a film that feels both unique and messy at times. While it may not be perfect, its ambition is commendable. The film’s short runtime of just under 90 minutes makes efficient use of its time, packing in numerous complex ideas and character moments.
Acting in Coherence is another aspect that has received positive feedback. The performances of the cast upgrade the material, bringing authenticity to their characters. The actors’ ability to improvise adds a layer of realism to the film, making the audience feel as if they are witnessing genuine interactions among friends. This commitment to character development is one reason why Coherence stands out among other low-budget films.
A Testament to Indie Filmmaking
Coherence serves as a testament to what indie filmmaking can achieve. It demonstrates that with creativity, resourcefulness, and a talented cast, filmmakers can create compelling narratives that resonate with audiences. The film shows that big ideas do not require big budgets; rather, they can emerge from simple yet profound storytelling.
Byrkit’s success with Coherence is significant not only for its contribution to the genre but also for its impact on independent filmmaking as a whole. It showcases the potential of small productions to tackle complex themes and engage viewers in meaningful ways. In an era when big-budget blockbusters often dominate the box office, Coherence reminds us that smaller films can deliver powerful messages and thought-provoking narratives.
The film’s legacy continues to inspire aspiring filmmakers and artists. It serves as a reminder that creativity can flourish in the face of limitations. Coherence encourages filmmakers to take risks, experiment with their craft, and embrace unconventional storytelling methods. Its influence can be seen in the growing number of indie films that tackle complex themes and push the boundaries of traditional narrative structures.
Conclusion: A Lasting Impact
Coherence stands out as a remarkable achievement in low-budget filmmaking. Its ability to blend high-concept science fiction with a genuine character scheme makes it a unique entry in the genre. The film’s minimalist approach, combined with its improvisational style, creates a sense of authenticity that resonates with viewers.
Still from Coherence (Credit: Prime Video)
The philosophical themes shown in Coherence challenge audiences to reflect on their own understanding of reality, identity, and the nature of existence. Despite its underappreciation, the film has garnered a loyal following and continues to inspire filmmakers and fans alike.
Coherence is a reminder that storytelling knows no bounds and that even the simplest of setups can lead to a profound scheme. It encourages viewers to embrace the unknown and to appreciate the beauty of creativity, no matter the budget.
Through its innovative approach and thought-provoking ideas, Coherence has secured its place in the pantheon of indie films that have successfully captured the imagination of audiences worldwide.
Only Murders in the Building Season 4 has been a serious yet exciting journey filled with twists, surprises, and many guest appearances. The show broke its usual pattern and revealed the killer of the main case before the last episode.
However, the Season 4 finale shows what really happened to Sazz (Jane Lynch) during the important opening night celebrations. Here is what you need to know about Sazz’s murder: she was the real target, her murder was done by one person, and in the end, it was all done for inspiration.
Who Was Sazz’s Protégé?
Sazz (Jane Lynch) admired Rex’s (Jin Ha) screenplay before sharing her own in Only Murders in the Building.
Rex Bailey, also known as Marshall P. Pope (Jin Ha), was Sazz’s stunt protégé. He tried hard to become a screenwriter, using his childhood struggles as the base for his script. Most of his actions came from wanting to show his father that he had real talent.
His accident on Project Ronkonkoma, when he messed up with Ron Howard’s eyebrows, ruined his chances of being a stuntman. So, he decided to focus back on writing.
When he talked to Sazz about his screenplay, she shared that she was also working on a screenplay, based on her friends’ podcast Only Murders in the Building. Her script was a strong first draft, which made Marshall feel very low. He thought, “Why does she get to be talented while I have to struggle for nothing?”
Marshall lied to Sazz and told her that her draft needed improvement. He offered to give her some rewrites. But instead of helping her, he stole her script, put his new screenwriter name on it, and sent it out to anyone who would read it, including Bev Melon (Molly Shannon) at Paramount Studios.
When Sazz found out about the script from some stunt friends looking for work, she confronted Marshall about what he had done. Marshall begged her to keep it a secret, but she said she would tell Charles (Steve Martin) about it after attending his Broadway debut. Marshall decided he would not let her ruin his chance. He had worked too hard.
Did Sazz’s Killer Really Do It All By Himself?
Marshall (Jin Ha) reconsiders what he’s about to do to his mentor, Sazz (Jane Lynch).
Knowing that Sazz would be at Charles’ apartment the next day, Marshall booked a red-eye flight at the empty Dudenoff apartment, which he remembered from Sazz’s first draft. He snuck into the apartment and aimed at Sazz as she walked down the sidewalk.
Just as he was about to take the shot, he hesitated and told himself, “You’re not a killer, you’re a writer.” But after that quick pep talk, he faced the fact that he wasn’t a writer yet. Motivated by the chance to create valuable writing material, he shot Sazz through the window.
Marshall was a skilled stuntman and had no fear of heights. He stepped out onto the ledge, which explains the boot print left on the windowsill. He quickly moved down the side of the building to the window of Charles’ apartment. Sazz’s last words to Marshall were, “He’s gonna get you… my Number One.”
Still from Only Murders in the Building (Credit: Hulu)
After she died, he took her body and disposed of it in the old incinerator. Contrary to what the trio thought, it really took one person 12 minutes to hit and dispose of Sazz’s body from the other side of the Arconia.
Charles Finally Taps In, With a Little Help From His Friends
When Mabel (Selena Gomez) confronted Marshall about the stolen script, he threatened her life. He alerted Charles and Oliver (Martin Short), who were in Charles’ apartment across the building. Mabel bought some time by saying she would help improve Marshall’s script.
Meanwhile, Charles and Oliver bravely made their way across the window ledge from Vince’s (Richard Kind) apartment next door. They originally meant to sneak Mabel out through the window, but Charles ended up entering the apartment while Vince and Rudy (Kumail Nanjiani) distracted Marshall.
He threatened Marshall with Eva Longoria’s 19-in-1 multi-tool, making him defenseless. After Marshall confessed to the murder and explained everything at (sort of) gunpoint, he got the upper hand and prepared to take them all out. But just as he shouted, “Welcome to the end of your movie,” he collapsed at their feet, shot in the back.
The gang looked over to find Jan Bellows (Amy Ryan), Charles’ crazy ex-girlfriend, waving from Charles’ apartment window. She had been hiding in his closet and the apartment for three weeks, waiting for the right moment to get revenge on the killer of their beloved Sazz.
Life Goes On at the Arconia, But So Does Murder
Loretta (Meryl Streep) and Oliver (Martin Short) walk down the aisle as newlyweds in Only Murders in the Building.
After everything settled down with the case, the trio chose to celebrate by visiting the set of their movie, which was still in production. Charles admitted that he appreciated the movie much more now, knowing it was a love letter to him from Sazz.
Their doubles patted themselves on the back for their small part in solving Sazz’s case, even though their brief collaboration left many loose ends. Bev Melon set up a pitch meeting with Mabel, who decided to change her idea from a movie about buttons to a film that would tell Sazz’s story. Mabel and Oliver watched Charles find peace within himself as he spoke to Sazz’s “ghost” one last time.
Oliver and Loretta finally had their wedding in the courtyard of the Arconia. Before the wedding, Loretta got news that her show was moving to New Zealand. This worried her because she feared she and Oliver would be separated just after they got married. Oliver happily offered to move to New Zealand with her. But she thought that he would get homesick and miss Mabel and Charles, so she agreed to accept a long-distance relationship.
Throughout the finale, Charles and Oliver noticed a pattern: every time they closed a case, another one opened. This made Oliver anxious that Loretta might be next. But he calmed down when she walked down the aisle.
Charles and Mabel then met Sofia Caccimelio (Téa Leoni), who wanted to hire them to find her presumably deceased husband, Nicky. In the last episode of Only Murders, a news story reported that Nicky “The Neck” Caccimelio, known as “the Dry Cleaning King of Brooklyn,” had gone missing.
Charles and Mabel turned down Sofia’s offer since it didn’t involve the Arconia, even though Sofia argued that what happened to Nicky had everything to do with the Arconia.
Regardless, they went their separate ways. When Charles, Mabel, and Oliver met to wrap up their podcast recording, they congratulated themselves for getting through the entire wedding without a new body to investigate. That was until they found their familiar Arconia doorman, Lester (Teddy Coluca), murdered in the courtyard fountain.
The Complex Web of Relationships
The finale highlighted not just the mystery surrounding Sazz’s murder but also the complex relationships among the characters. Throughout the season, we have seen Charles, Oliver, and Mabel grow closer. Their friendship has deepened as they solved one mystery after another. This time, they faced their biggest challenge yet, which put their bonds to the test.
Still from Only Murders in the Building (Credit: Hulu)
Charles, played by Steve Martin, is often seen as the serious one in the group. He cares deeply about his friends and feels a sense of responsibility for their safety. His character has gone through much development throughout the series, showing his vulnerability and determination to protect those he loves.
His relationship with Mabel has grown from one of mentorship to one of genuine friendship. They have shared many moments that have built a strong foundation for their partnership.
Mabel, portrayed by Selena Gomez, is the heart of the group. She brings energy and creativity to the table, often balancing Charles’ serious nature. Mabel’s relationship with Oliver, played by Martin Short, is filled with humor and warmth. They often find themselves joking and making light of tough situations, providing comic relief during darker moments in the storyline.
Oliver, the flamboyant and dramatic character, is often the life of the party. His relationships with both Charles and Mabel showcase a mix of humor and deep emotional connection.
His willingness to go to great lengths to protect his friends adds another layer to his character. The wedding scenes, in particular, illustrate how these characters come together to celebrate love and friendship in the face of adversity.
The Theme of Inspiration
A strong theme of inspiration runs throughout the season. Sazz’s murder serves as a catalyst for many of the characters to reflect on their lives and careers. Rex’s actions, driven by jealousy and the desire to succeed, highlight the darker side of ambition.
Instead of being inspired by Sazz, he chose to sabotage her, leading to tragic consequences. This theme encourages viewers to consider how they handle their aspirations and relationships.
Sazz’s character represents the idea of mentorship and support. Her encouragement of Rex’s writing dreams shows her belief in nurturing talent, but her tragic end forces everyone to reckon with the consequences of ambition gone wrong. The finale ties these themes together beautifully, reminding the audience that inspiration can lead to both creation and destruction.
The Future of the Arconia
As the season comes to a close, the future of the Arconia is uncertain. The murder of Lester raises questions about safety and security in the building. The characters have faced one murder after another, and now they must confront the reality that their home is a dangerous place. This sets the stage for the next season, which promises to be just as thrilling.
The open-ended nature of the finale leaves viewers wanting more. Charles, Mabel, and Oliver’s journey is far from over. The introduction of new characters, like Sofia, hints at more mysteries to solve and more adventures ahead. The Arconia itself remains a character in the story, with its history and secrets continuing to unfold.
Final Thoughts
Only Murders in the Building Season 4 has taken viewers on a wild ride, blending mystery, humor, and heartfelt moments. The season finale ties up some loose ends while opening new doors for future storytelling. Sazz’s tragic story serves as a reminder of the complexities of ambition and the importance of friendship.
Still from Only Murders in the Building (Credit: Hulu)
As the trio moves forward, they will undoubtedly face new challenges, and fans eagerly await the next chapter in their story.
All episodes of Only Murders in the Building Season 4 are available to stream on Hulu. The blend of humor, suspense, and emotional depth keeps viewers engaged and invested in the lives of these characters, making the show a standout in the streaming television world.
