Fans’ hopes for Keanu Reeves’ return as the occult detective John Constantine surged in October after the actor announced a fresh script draft for Constantine 2 had landed.
Reeves, who revived interest in the role with back-to-back successes like John Wick and his charismatic cult following from the 2005 original, sounded upbeat as he revealed his team’s plans to deliver the script to DC Studios.
Reputable outlets, including IGN and ComicBookMovie, confirmed that Reeves is optimistic, telling reporters he hopes the studio leadership will approve this new vision for the sequel.
For years, Reeves and original director Francis Lawrence, along with producer and screenwriter Akiva Goldsman, have tried to advance the project amid Hollywood’s constantly changing environment. Early in 2025, DC leadership reportedly gave a tentative thumbs-up for the creative team to start drafting a new story.
The sequel, if made, promises a narrative set in the same dark, metaphysical world as the first film, a place where Reeves’s Constantine faces even greater torment and supernatural threats.
However, this wave of renewed excitement continues to crash against the realities of studio politics and the blockbuster stakes of the modern DC Universe.
While fans call for more grounded supernatural tales rather than overblown CGI spectacles, filmmakers now find themselves contending with the expectations of DC Studios co-chiefs James Gunn and Peter Safran, who must balance nostalgia with their plans for a fresh DCU slate.
Studio Tensions and Timeline Tangles: Inside James Gunn’s Latest Response
Discussion about Constantine 2 reached a fever pitch when James Gunn, now steering the reimagined DC Universe, addressed the swirling speculation.
In a widely cited interview on the BobaTalks podcast, Gunn acknowledged that talks with Reeves have happened “on and off,” describing the creative team as “great guys” with ample talent. Still, Gunn was blunt: he had yet to see, let alone approve, a script for the next Constantine chapter.
Back then, Gunn described any DC project outside the continuity of his new shared universe labeled “Elseworlds” as requiring something uniquely compelling to justify investment.
Industry reporters have highlighted one major reason for the holdup: recent regime shifts at both Warner Bros. Discovery and DC Studios. With each leadership change comes a re-evaluation of legacy properties and new priorities for future blockbusters.
As Gunn’s DCU launches juggernaut projects like Superman and Creature Commandos, movies like Constantine 2 are left circling in development, threatened by shifting budgets, timeline bottlenecks, and creative risk aversion.
Where Does That Leave Constantine 2, and What Do Fans Want Next?
While no formal production schedule or release date exists, fans aren’t ready to give up. John Constantine, initially brought to life by Alan Moore and Steve Bissette in the comics, flourished as a cult classic through Reeves’s unconventional and gritty 2005 performance.
James Gunn (Credit: BBC)
Online communities and entertainment outlets continue to fuel speculation, dissecting every interview and update.
The script, reportedly penned by Goldsman, remains shrouded in secrecy except for promises that it will challenge Constantine with even darker twists and introduce returning cast members where possible.
Meanwhile, actor Peter Stormare, who played Lucifer in the original, has said publicly that Reeves holds high standards for the sequel and has pushed back against studio demands for “louder” or more “spectacular” scenes.
As DC Studios juggles ambitious new plans with loyal audiences yearning for familiar faces, Constantine 2’s status remains precarious but not impossible. Reeves, Lawrence, and their team hold out hope that their “sleeper hit” can step back into the haunted spotlight provided they get a clear signal from DC Studios.
For now, all eyes remain on James Gunn and the ever-turning gears at Warner Bros. As fans await the next domino to fall, one truth is clear: John Constantine’s afterlife in Hollywood isn’t sealed yet, but only a bold, timely choice from DC’s new regime will determine if he rises again.
When Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ shattered box office expectations in 2004, few imagined a biblical drama could rival Hollywood blockbusters in financial muscle.
The film’s original $30 million budget resulted in over $610 million in global earnings, setting records as the highest-grossing indie and R-rated movie until just recently.
Now, with its long-awaited sequels confirmed, Gibson is returning not with another modestly made drama, but two ambitious, effects-heavy spectacles, each scheduled to cost $100 million, cumulatively tripling the original outlay.
What’s driving this leap? First, Gibson has set his sights on visual storytelling rarely seen in faith-based releases. Industry trade sites like Deadline and ScreenRant detail that the new films will push boundaries by staging massive battles between supernatural forces.
Angels and demons aren’t just hinted at; they are core to the story, with set pieces and visual effects rivaling big-budget fantasy franchises. Gibson has described the concept as “super ambitious,” focusing on Christ’s descent into Hell and the cosmic struggle that follows his resurrection.
Unlike the first film, which essentially covered 12 hours of Christ’s life with raw realism, these sequels promise settings and action sequences that demand advanced computer graphics, expanded sets, and blockbuster-level production teams.
Another factor is the sheer size and logistics involved. Filming is underway at Rome’s Cinecittà Studios, the same historic venue used for the original, and across Southern Italy.
This logistical spread, including location shoots in rural towns, means ballooning costs for transport, elaborate set construction, and international cast accommodations.
Major recasting has taken place as well: Jaakko Ohtonen now leads as Jesus, with Mariela Garriga as Mary Magdalene and a fresh slate of actors taking over critical roles, both to fit the new vision and to avoid complex, costly de-aging VFX for returning cast members.
The script itself, co-written with Braveheart’s Randall Wallace, has been kept tightly under wraps. No buyers have seen the details ahead of the project’s American Film Market showcase, forcing investors to put faith in Gibson’s reputation and vision, a rare bet even among studio insiders.
Blockbuster Moves, Risky Bets: Studio Decisions and Religious Fandom
By tripling the budget, Gibson and his backers are reaching for a market much larger than traditional biblical epics. Lionsgate, the distributing studio, is banking on global and especially faith-based audiences, who turned the original film into a phenomenon.
The sequels are set to premiere in two parts in 2027, aligning releases with Good Friday and Ascension Day for maximum religious and seasonal impact. Such strategic timing is designed to create event-level excitement akin to the staggered releases of superhero or fantasy franchises.
Yet, this approach also heightens risk. Religious films occasionally spark controversy, and Gibson’s original faced criticism for its graphic portrayals and alleged anti-Semitic messaging.
This time, the new installments court additional scrutiny by blending biblical accounts with imaginative metaphysical spectacles described by Gibson as an “acid trip” showing visions of hell, angelic warfare, and journeys beyond conventional gospel accounts.
The decision to keep scripts secret until late in production further ups the stakes, as external observers have little idea what tone or message the final product might deliver.
Meanwhile, the fandom surrounding The Passion of the Christ remains unprecedented in independent cinema. The original amassed $370 million domestically, a feat only recently surpassed by Deadpool & Wolverine.
The promise of cutting-edge effects and epic storytelling could draw both returning fans and new audiences spilling out from Marvel, DC, and fantasy mainstays. But stakes are high: if audiences reject the ambitious creative direction, financiers could be left exposed to something rarely seen in faith-centric productions.
Beyond Faith: Cultural Impact and the Future of Gibson’s Gospel Saga
Looking ahead, the sequels’ influence could ripple across both religious and pop culture spaces. Should these films match the commercial impact of the original, expectations for biblical cinema will shift, making room for more ambitious, genre-blending blockbusters outside the usual superhero or fantasy cycles.
Passion Of The Christ (Credit: Netflix)
The recasting of iconic roles, especially with European actors, may also broaden international engagement, elevating the mythic scale while reshaping traditions of how familiar gospel stories are told.
The timing is especially notable, with Mel Gibson returning to bigger projects after a significant hiatus, following mixed box office results with his recent thriller Flight Risk. This comeback could cement his reputation as both a risk-taker and one of Hollywood’s rare talents capable of merging religious themes with visual spectacle.
At stake is more than box office glory. Success might lead to a new era where studios take chances on faith-based megaprojects, challenging other filmmakers to raise production standards for narratives drawn from religious tradition.
The creative risks with storylines touching on spiritual journeys, cosmic battles, and reinterpreted biblical moments promise not just entertainment but deep questions about art, scripture, and the ongoing role religion plays in international movie culture.
Gibson’s two-part Resurrection saga will stand as a marker of what happens when faith, fandom, and blockbuster ambition collide, all at a scale no biblical movie has ever attempted before.
