The second season of Netflix’s “Nobody Wants This” dropped in October 2025 with a buzz that quickly turned into a split reaction on Rotten Tomatoes.
Critics have mostly embraced the new episodes, giving the season a respectable 77% critic score as it expands on the complex relationship between Noah, a rabbi, and Joanne, an agnostic podcast host.
However, the audience’s Rotten Tomatoes score is much cooler, resting around 58%, highlighting the divided response from the viewing public. This is a significant drop from season one, which scored 95% with critics and 85% among fans.
The critics’ appreciation centers partly on the continued chemistry between leads Adam Brody and Kristen Bell, as well as the show’s willingness to tackle interfaith relationship tensions with nuance and humor.
Reviewers praised the balance of emotional moments and comedic beats, noting that the season adds a fresh, realistic layer to the couple’s journey beyond the initial romantic excitement. Some critics marked the season as “smart,” “funny,” and maintaining the “irresistible” charm that made the original season a surprise hit.
However, many fans feel differently. On social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit, viewers shared frustration with the storytelling direction. Some labeled the season as repetitive, especially criticizing Noah and Joanne’s relationship for circling back to unresolved doubts rather than progressing.
Others found the characters less compelling and dynamic, with Joanne’s personality receiving particular backlash for becoming whiny and high-maintenance in their eyes. Fans also expressed annoyance at side plots that seemed inconsequential or stereotypical compared to the fresh themes of season one.
One reason cited for this division is that season two lacks the originality and novelty that energized the first season’s reception. New characters, including notable additions like Leighton Meester, and side storylines intended to add depth or humor, apparently did not resonate with audiences as intended.
Some viewers described the tone as awkward, with fewer genuine romantic sparks and more forced sitcom-style antics, which contrasts with critics who still found the season’s humor on point.
Audience Pushback and Social Media Reaction
The fan backlash extends beyond ratings and reviews into the realm of social media opinion, where passionate viewers have mounted critiques about the show’s perceived shortcomings.
Several fans on Reddit pointed out that the main romantic plot feels stuck in place, specifically criticizing the show’s approach to interfaith relationship challenges as dragging without meaningful resolution.
Many fans also commented that additional characters like Noah’s sister-in-law, Esther, and Joanne’s sister, Morgan, shifted from interesting side stories to clichés or distracting subplots. Some found Morgan’s increasingly juvenile antics out of sync with the tone and maturity level set by the lead characters.
Meanwhile, others appreciated improved complexity in Esther’s character development but still viewed her pregnancy storyline as unoriginal.
Nobody Wants This Season 2 (Credit: Netflix)
This has contributed to the intensity of the negative responses, with some questioning the show’s appeal in light of Bell’s public image challenges.
Fan discussions tend to reflect a division not only in entertainment tastes but also in expectations. While some are willing to embrace lighter, less intense romantic comedies as “easy, light-hearted watch” experiences, others hoped for the narrative depth and emotional authenticity that made season one special.
What the Future Holds for Nobody Wants This
Despite mixed reactions, “Nobody Wants This” season two continues to spark conversations about religion, modern relationships, and cultural differences.
The creators have been praised by critics for handling these complex themes with humor and respect, though some feel the season misses chances to explore them more deeply.
The show’s creators, Erin Foster and Jenni Konner, recently discussed changes made to the season’s finale, underscoring a willingness to adapt storytelling to better resonate with audiences.
For Netflix, the debate between critical acclaim and audience dissatisfaction represents a challenge. The platform’s model often balances artistic ambition with viewer engagement metrics, and a dip in audience enthusiasm can influence renewal decisions or creative directions.
Should the show continue, fans hope for more meaningful character growth and a break from repetitive conflicts. Critics, meanwhile, remain cautiously optimistic that the series can build on its strengths without losing what made it appealing initially.
In a crowded streaming market, “Nobody Wants This” illustrates the difficulty of maintaining freshness in romantic comedy series that hinge heavily on character dynamics and relationship tension.
Whether the show can reconcile the gap between strong critical reception and increasingly vocal fan critiques will shape its trajectory.
This dynamic around “Nobody Wants This” season two highlights the complexities of modern TV success, where shows are judged not only by quality but also by how effectively they evolve storylines and respond to diverse audience expectations in real time.
For now, the divide on Rotten Tomatoes remains a telling sign of how challenging it is to keep every viewer happy while pushing stories forward.
DC’s latest update on the anticipated Lanterns live-action series has ignited a storm among longtime Green Lantern fans and newcomers alike.
The news: Hal Jordan , classic Green Lantern and fan favorite since his comics debut, will serve more as a mentor or transitional figure rather than headline the franchise. Instead, rising star Aaron Pierre steps into the limelight as John Stewart, signaling a swift handoff that many never expected to see so soon.
Initial reactions across Reddit, DC fan sites, and entertainment news outlets have been sharply divided. Some see the move as a progressive update, pointing out that John Stewart already became the main Green Lantern in the comics after Hal stepped aside years ago.
Others argue it’s disrespectful to Hal’s decades-long history, especially after the poorly received 2011 Green Lantern movie left his legacy in need of redemption.
Screen Rant’s reporting confirms that showrunner Chris Mundy describes the Lanterns series as centered “in a lot of ways about replacement,” teasing themes of generational change and when it’s time to let the next hero take the reins.
With Chandler cast as the older Hal and Pierre as the youthful John, fans speculate Hal will be phased out quickly, fueling debates over whether the franchise should reboot or build on the originals.
The Fan Backlash: Nostalgia Meets New Narratives
Online reactions highlight a significant divide within the Green Lantern fan base. On Reddit and in comment sections, many argue that Hal Jordan’s story still has miles to go; they want to see his arc explored, especially since the first live-action attempt was met with criticism.
For these fans, jumping straight to Stewart as a lead could mean cutting iconic Green Lantern stories before they’ve had a chance to connect with modern viewers.
Yet others, like fans posting under DC groups and comics forums, welcome the twist, noting Stewart’s popularity in animated shows and comics, and how his military background brings needed representation and a fresh perspective to the screen.
Lanterns (Credit: IMDb)
John Stewart’s comic journey from backup Lantern to leader saw him face systemic bias, personal loss, and difficult missions, making him a layered, relatable character for many. Something DC’s recent hits, including Peacemaker, have capitalized on with more complex leads.
There’s also talk about the business behind the shift. Some fans on entertainment blogs argue the show’s writers, including acclaimed figures from Black Mirror and Watchmen, are eager to bring in new audiences and avoid retreading old movie failures.
By making Lanterns more like a detective thriller set on Earth, DC hopes to reboot the entire Green Lantern mythos for fans burnt out on overblown CGI and space opera clichés. However, others caution that focusing too closely on replacements might alienate viewers who want a balance of legacy and innovation.
What DC’s Gamble Means for the Franchise
This polarization is more than just fan infighting; it reveals how superhero franchises must evolve to survive. DC’s Lanterns update hints at ambitious plans: create fresh stories, reclaim critical ground lost to previous flops, and leverage character diversity to build new loyalty.
Casting a younger lead while letting older heroes mentor signals a long-term approach like Marvel’s with Hawkeye and Ms. Marvel.
Whether the handoff succeeds depends on execution and on whether DC proves it won’t simply toss beloved legacy characters aside. Some industry experts point out that, if Lanterns invests deeply in Stewart’s arc while letting Hal remain a meaningful force, the show could bridge old and new fans.
Creators have indicated the series will launch in early 2026 with a mix of grounded storytelling and classic comic inspiration, giving hope that Lanterns could expand the Green Lantern mythos after years of uncertain adaptations.
For now, passionate arguments continue on fan forums and social media, with everyone watching DC’s bold move and wondering whose light will shine the brightest.
